Currently, the relationship between the film and the audience how? In general, the last out of the Kazakh films take the viewer? Today, the viewer sees what the movie? Of course, in this post-Soviet period and the first ten-to-fifteen years of independence, in most cases, official publications, television programs through specialists representing the views and the same percentage of the audience saw cinemas go digital movies, sometimes quick to be determined by conducting interviews among the audience.

However, today's increase in the more technical features (sites, social networks) has led to changes in the shape of the relationship between film and viewer. So, what changes?

Currently, the most mentioned by the audience bildiriletini a review of historical and biographical and commercial films. While the Internet and social networks do not appear in the reviews of the main space official publications, but now the situation is completely changed. Today, the official publications of the various sites, social networks only specialists, not only the general public an opportunity to express his opinion. In other words, social networks, Internet sites, and other features gradually formed as informal. It is not a special ad is served and the film allows the audience to get information about how emergency.

However, the lack of information about all the films? Spectators were able to see them? Of course, this is the second side of the problem. Watch Baywatch (2017) hd Movie Online. 

Obviously, when the majority of taste, and of thought will be different. In particular, real-life biography movies about historical events and persons known to be priority attention to be paid to them when the screen. This last one or two pages of the press, especially in social networks, "Amanat", "", "Diamond Sword" Kunanbay films around the public interest had been expressed different opinions Troy fact . Of course, historical review qaliptastirwsilar audience about art and literature, culture and science who are in the field of education, community involvement, etc. In other words, social networks and sites of today's Kazakh cinema audience has become the main podium of the review.

In fact, the filmmakers visiting historical topics at the end always ended successfully. Authors and also to work for himself that he is one of the most responsible and capricious theme. If they do not often subject to Kazakh cinema in the last 25 years, the resonance formats, although not many of the major historical figures and events, presented some movies. However, experts and the public, he fell in the shower by the critical approach to the same audience proved not to be taken on the part of all the films. A similar situation in the 1990s took place in the historical-biographical movie appears on the screen. At the same time as the historical theme bold style in literature, training and creative potential that the industry was clear that very few authors Kazakh cinema.

In the first decade of the new century Kazakh cinema audience about the absence of historical figures "appear on the screen before Birzhan sal", "Mustafa Shokai", "Makhambet", "Batyr Bayan" movies offered. Of course, the new theme again attracted attention to many. But when it appears on the screen the films and social networking sites still did not have a high intensity. They are formed by the major reviews in newspapers and magazines and TV channels. And the last one or two years by the majority of the films from the fall to discuss the comprehensive special publications and radio and television programs, the impact of these social networks and Internet sites, features must say that it is very extensive.

Social network user audience of any film output, leave immediately posted on his personal opinion about the modern strand of opinion "between the audience and the film shows" began to shrink, too.